HOME
What's New

CPU Cooler
Programs
Introduction
AmnHLT
CpuIdle
Rain 
VCool 2.0 
Waterfall Pro 
Current Tests 
Test Archives

UDMA Driver 
Tests 
Windows 95
Windows 98
Windows NT

Way 2 Cool 
Projects 
Compaq 1800T
1800T Temp Monitor
Celeron-A
Going for 504
More on 504
Cheap Sandwich
BX6r2 Diode Fix
Condensation
Lap that Slug
Celeron PPGA
Journey to 1080
Building an NT Box
Heat Pipe 1
Heat Pipe 2
Heat Pipe 2.2
gp_Temp
gp_Temp4
gp_Temp5

Heat Sinks 
Aavid
A&C Prototype Sink
Alpha P125
Alpha P521
CPU Cooler
FullWay
Tom's Sink
Water Cooler 1
Water Cooler 2
Water Cooler 3
Water Cooler 4
*
Water Cooler 6
Water Cooler 7

Way 2 Cool
Thermometer
Thermometer 2
K-6 heat sink
Case Cooling
Heat Sink Tester
More Case Cooling
Klamath heat sink
Q500A Cooling
My Server Temps
Temp Calculators
CKS400 Rack Case
Fan Controller
Cooling Links
Downloads Page

Tips and Trix
Dual Boot Win95 / 98
Dual Boot Linux/NT4
D-B Linux/Win2k
Hot Flash your BIOS

Family Stuff
Prom / St. John
Providenciales

Email Jim

Test 1- Idle Temperatures

All of these programs do a great job of lowering the Idle temperature of the CPU.  The temperatures shown in the first chart are the result of letting the system sit idle for about 20 minutes. The three cooling program's temperatures had stabilized well before the 20 minute time limit had expired, while using no program, the temperature continued to slowly rise, ultimately to 101.1° F. 

 The difference in cooler program temperatures are mostly due to the differences in room temperature, not the ultimate "cooling" ability of each program. Though there differences in the way the programs enable the HLT command, the results of enabling the command are pretty much the same.

My computer room temperature is very hard to regulate exactly.   With winter in full force here, I have rigged an auxiliary heater and thermostat to try to approximate summer temperatures.  Even with a couple of fans to circulate the air, some stratification occurs and the temperature at the computer (floor level) constantly changes by a couple of degrees with air movement.  It is best to judge the increase or decrease in temperature for each individual test, rather than looking for the highest or lowest temp in a column. 

For someone who has had to deal with the searing heat of the AMD K6-233 overclocked, the Celeron 300A is a very nice change.  This chip responds well to a good sized heat sink and good case ventilation, which is reflected in the numbers below. 

Test 1 -Idle temperatures - Celeron 300A @ 464 MHz

Program @ Idle
Room °F 
Case °F 
Heat Sink °F 
CPU °F 
None
81.0
82.0 
91.0 
97.0 
AmnHLT 1.0
80.2
82.0
85.5
85.9
CpuIdle 5.1
Win Mode
80.1
81.5 
84.4
85.8 
CpuIdle 5.1
Control Panel
80.4
81.5
84.7
85.4
Rain 1.0
 82.0 
 82.9 
85.1 
85.2 
Waterfall 1.23
 79.2 
 81.0 
84.7
85.3 
Waterfall Pro 2.1
80.0
80.8
84.2
84.6

The addition of one of the cooler programs brings the temperature down even lower.   Four and a half degrees above room temp for the processor is pretty darn good.   Note that in my system, the difference between running a program and not running it is over 11°F.  Test 2 - WinBench99
In earlier WinBench tests, I stated that the cooler programs did little to degrade performance.  For my system, some of the programs actually helped performance.  At first I was a bit skeptical of the WinBench results, so I ran the tests another three times each.  I received similar results.  The scores reflected here are the average of 3 tests each on 3 seperate installations of Win95 OSR2.  Win98 performance is similar.

Test 2  WinBench99  Performance - Celeron 300A @ 464 MHz

WinBench 99
CPU 32
Mark
FPU
Business
Disk
H.E.
Disk
Trans. Rate
Beginning
Trans. Rate
End
Random
Access (ms)
CPU
Utilization
Starting
CPU
Temp.
Highest
CPU
Temp.
None
951
2430
2330
7000
11200
10800
12.3
5.34
95.5
102.4
AmnHLT 1.0
946
2420
2310
6970
11200
10700
12.4
6.63
84.5
94.7
CpuIdle 5.1
Win Mode
953
2420
2320
7030
11200
10900
12.4
7.40
84.6
93.2
CpuIdle 5.1
Cntrl Pnl
961
2440
2360
7080
11200
10900
12.4
5.31
84.4
96.4
Rain 1.0
972
2460
2350
7050
11200
10900
12.4
4.29
82.9
95.2
Waterfall 1.23
958
2440
2320
6940
11200
10900
12.4
5.34
82.9
96.6
Waterfall
Pro 2.1
961
2440
2370
7090
11200
10900
12.4
5.19
83.7
96.2

Test 3
I have really grown to like this benchmark.  In fact, I tried to contact the company to upgrade from the shareware version to the registered version.  Unfortunately the company seems to have dropped off the face of the web.  If anyone has a working link to U software, please let me know.  The non-working URL I have for them is: http://www.usoftware.com/

UPDATE: Thanks to Jim McLeod, I have a new link to the program.  Try this German site: http://www1.idg.se/mikrodatorn/sharew/95diag.htm  The email for the author of the program is: underwoe@Colorado.Edu

Here again I received some results that were better when running the programs than without.  I was again skeptical of the results and ended up running each program about 10 times over the course of a few days.  The results varied by a point or two, but the pattern remained constant.

Test 5B  Bench32 CPU Performance - Celeron 300A @ 464 MHz

Bench32 v.1.21
No Cooler
Program
AmnHLT
1.0
CpuIdle 5.1
Win Mode
CpuIdle 5.1
Cntrl Pnl
Rain
1.0
Waterfall
1.23
Waterfall
Pro 2.1
Total Processor Score 
640
628
638
 636
653
642
648
CPU mark
577
567
577
 575
584
581
583
FPU mark
798
780
789
 791
825
796
810
Starting Room 
Temp °F
81.9
80.6
80.8
 80.2
78.4
78.9
80.2
Starting Case 
Temp °F
83.7
82.8
81.7
 81.5
80.2
79.7
82.0
Starting Heat Sink 
Temp °F
93.4
85.5
84.9
 84.6
84.6
 83.5
84.7
Starting CPU 
Temp °F
98.2
85.7
 85.3
 85.7
 85.7
 84.1
85.0
Highest Room 
Temp °F
82.0
80.6
 80.8
 80.1
 78.4
78.8
79.8
Highest Case 
Temp °F
 84.0
82.8
 81.9
 81.5
 80.4
79.7
81.7
Highest Heat Sink 
Temp °F
 94.1
91.6
 91.0
90.7
 88.4
89.3
91.2
Highest CPU 
Temp °F
101.6
96.4
93.9
 95.7
91.9
94.3
95.4
 Waterfall1.23 seems to have a slight edge on the competition again.  At about a 2% difference between the highest and lowest scores, it's not something you'd notice -- but it's there.

Test 4
Early in the testing, I was looking for applications that I used on a daily basis that I could use as benchmarks.  While running CpuIdle 2.4 and transferring a large file from a CD-ROM to one of my hard disks, I noticed that the CPU temperature shot up from around 80° to over 110° in a short period of time.  I hadn't noticed that much heat being generated with the other programs, so I ended up copying the Windows95 folder from CD to hard disk as a test.  File size = 79 MB.

The hard disk was defragged and the CPU was allowed to cool between each test.  Each test was run 3 times and the results were averaged.

The Cd to disk and disk to disk tests for the Celeron were much the same as the earlier tests performed on the AMD.  The "control panel" version of CpuIdle which still uses the VxD was not as effective in keeping the processor from heating up during the transfer of files.

Test 6B CD to Hard Disk - Celeron 300A @ 464 MHz

CD to 
Hard Disk 
No
Cooler
AmnHLT
1.0
CpuIdle 5.1
Win Mode
CpuIdle 5.1
Cntrl Panel
Rain
1.0
Waterfall
1.23
Waterfall
Pro 2.1
Room 
Temp °F
81.0
78.3
81.0
79.9
81.0
81.0
81.0
CPU Start 
Temp °F 
98.6
81.9
84.9
84.7
84.7
84.6
84.8
CPU End 
Temp  °F 
99.5
92.7
85.5
94.1
85.7
85.5
85.4
.
Test 5
After viewing the results of the CD to HD test, I wondered if I would get the same results transferring a file between my two hard disks.  Because the disk-to-disk transfer takes much less time, I increased the file size to 500 MB to give the CPU a chance to react. This is the same test as I performed with the K6.

Test 7B Hard Disk to Hard Disk - Celeron 300A @ 464 MHz

Hard Disk to 
Hard Disk 
No
Cooler
AmnHLT
1.0
CpuIdle 5.1
Win Mode
CpuIdle 5.1
Cntrl Panel
Rain
1.0
Waterfall
1.23
Waterfall
Pro 2.1
Room 
Temp °F
82.0
78.3
80.2
79.7
80.8
81.0
80.8
CPU Start 
Temp °F 
99.0
82.8
84.9
84.9
85.0
84.8
84.7
CPU End 
Temp  °F 
101.9
89.9
85.1
90.7
85.1
85.0
85.1

Test 6
I thought I might as well round out this series by checking hard disk to floppy disk transfer temperatures.  File size was 1.38 MB.

Test 8B Hard Disk to Floppy Disk - Celeron 300A @ 464 MHz

Hard Disk 
to Floppy
No
Cooler
AmnHLT
1.0
CpuIdle 5.1
Win Mode
CpuIdle 5.1
Cntrl Panel
Rain
1.0
Waterfall
1.23
Waterfall
Pro 2.1
Room 
Temp °F
80.0
78.6
81.3
80.1
80.4
80.6
80.8
CPU Start 
Temp °F 
94.6
83.1
86.0
85.1
85.3
86.0
86.1
CPU End 
Temp  °F 
99.4
91.2
86.0
92.8
85.3
86.0
86.1
For all but the two programs, clicking on the file had more of an impact than the file transfer.  The CPU temp raised a couple of tenths and returned to where it was before the transfer began.

Memory
I had some problems with recording memory usage with a utility called Wintop.  It was suggested that I use Norton Utilities System Information - memory function.  Using Norton, I documented the memory usage for the cooler programs.  This utility, unlike Wintop, did not seem to mind what other programs were running in the background or how many times I rebooted.  The memory usage remained constant.  Thank gawd for small favors. :-)  Please note that these are my memory results and that your non-shared and total module memory will vary depending on what other programs you are running and what options you select with the cooler programs.

Memory Used   Chart 3

Norton Utilities
In KB
Total Non-Shared 
Memory 32-Bit
Total Non-Shared 
Memory 16-Bit
Total Allocated
Memory
Total
Module
Dynamic
Device Driver
AmnHLT 1.0
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
.61 - 609 bytes
AmnHLT & Viewer
n/a
n/a
27.4
1.59MB
.61 - 609 bytes
CpuIdle 5.1
1006
n/a
14.1
1.70 MB
n/a
CpuIdle 5.1
Control Panel
91.1
n/a
3.13
88
3.25
Rain 1.0
217
n/a
8.63
208
n/a
Waterfall1.23
217
0.81
8.63
208
n/a
Waterfall Pro 2.1
177
n/a
36.8
140
n/a
n/a = not applicable or no results shown
.
 Conclusion
No matter which of these programs you choose to use, you will benefit from a cooler running processor.  With the exception of the file transfer tests, the results are very close and it is doubtful that you would notice a difference in performance between the programs.  Choose the program based on features (or lack of them) and which works best on your system.  Please keep in mind that the results will vary with the processor type, system, and configuration used.  I have not tested these programs on any systems but my own.  Your mileage may vary.
 
 
 
The reviews and tests
AmnHLT
CPUIdle
Rain
Waterfall Pro
VCool 2.0
Current Tests
Test Archives